Earlier this yr once we have been getting giddy for Ryzen, rumors started surfacing about how Intel would possibly reply. On the time, we knew Ryzen would convey 6 and Eight-core CPUs to the mainstream and it already seemed as if Intel’s quad-cores could be unable to compete. Granted, the 7600Ok and 7700Ok nonetheless look robust when gaming, however their time within the solar appears restricted.
Together with making ready a collection of Skylake-X processors, Intel’s counter to Ryzen features a Kaby Lake-X lineup consisting of the Core i5-7640X, which is mainly a renamed 7600Ok, and the Core i7-7740X, a 7700Ok in disguise.
Main as much as their arrival, it was advised that the 7640X would possibly characteristic Hyper-Threading help, primarily making it a Core i7, whereas the 7740X would maybe tout 6-cores. These upgrades did not appear notably prone to me, and it additionally appeared unbelievable that Intel would launch present mainstream CPUs on their high-end desktop platform. In spite of everything, what would that obtain and the way would this in any method be a counter to Ryzen?
It appeared much more possible that Intel would repackage its 7600Ok and 7700Ok Kaby Lake chips as Kaby-Lake X components and name it a day, and that is exactly what the corporate has completed.
On paper, you will see that the Kaby Lake-X components include a light manufacturing unit overclock and sport a better TDP whereas pricing stays the identical. Nevertheless, you’ll be able to anticipate to spend extra on a Kaby Lake-X construct because of its pricier X299 platform.
It is onerous to think about why anybody would spend twice as a lot on an X299 board for these quad-core CPUs once they can get all the identical options and capabilities in a Z270 board for half the value. Not solely that, however half the options will not even work on the X299 boards when utilizing a Kaby Lake-X CPU as they lack the required quantity of PCIe lanes and solely help dual-channel reminiscence.
Setting that mess apart for now, let’s transfer on to see whether or not the brand new Core i5-7640X and Core i7-7740X carry out any quicker than the acquainted i5-7600Ok and i7-7700Ok…
Artificial & Utility Benchmarks
As talked about, the Kaby Lake-X CPUs nonetheless solely characteristic a dual-channel reminiscence controller, in contrast to the Skylake-X components such because the 7800X which boast quad-channel reminiscence help. Unsurprisingly, when working DDR4-3200, we noticed the identical 31GB/s of reminiscence bandwidth for the Kaby Lake-X components as we did with the 7700Ok and 7600Ok.
The numbers in Cinebench R15 weren’t sudden. Regardless of their slight frequency benefit, the 7740X and 7640X are each solely in a position to match the scores of their LGA1151 equivalents. At this level we largely know what we have to know, however I ran a heap of benchmarks anyway so we would as effectively verify them out — there are a number of attention-grabbing numbers to notice.
Take 7-Zip’s figures for instance: the 7740X managed to tug forward of the 7700Ok but the identical cannot be stated for the 7640X versus the 7600Ok.
This time the 7740X was solely in a position to match the 7700Ok in our Excel check whereas the 7640X falls behind the 7600Ok.
Transferring to the PCMark 10 Necessities benchmark, the older mainstream Kaby Lake components present one of the best outcomes right here, narrowly outscoring newer Kaby Lake-X fashions — a somewhat disappointing consequence for Intel’s new excessive efficiency quad-core processors.
The 7700Ok and 7600Ok have been once more in a position to outscore the 7740X and 7640X, this time by a fairly convincing margin within the productiveness assessments.
One thing odd is going on right here. The 7740X and 7640X have been considerably slower for the photograph enhancing check and I am undecided why. These outcomes do not actually make sense however I can guarantee you that I double checked them.
The final PCMark 10 check simulated enhancing efficiency and right here once more the older Kaby Lake CPUs outpaced the 7740X and 7640X, albeit by slim margins.