Santa Clara, California resident Alex Nguyen has spent numerous hours amassing and documenting each follow he believes to be towards a free and open web on Verizon’s community. Relationship again to 2012, Nguyen has logged 112 pages value of alleged net neutrality violations with over 300 citations of proof.
Because it seems, the FCC has not really decided on any formal complaints concerning net neutrality. Though there have been hundreds of messages despatched to the FCC voicing considerations over rolling again insurance policies to defend on-line freedom, Nguyen was the one particular person to file a proper complaint on the difficulty.
The principle distinction between a proper and casual complaint is that formal complaints should undergo a listening to course of and finish with an official response from the FCC. Casual complaints don’t require any substantive response and could also be largely dismissed by board members. Submitting a proper complaint with the FCC could be very related to submitting a court docket case and can set you again $225 in charges.
Ngyuen’s complaint consists of quite a lot of points from Verizon blocking the usage of sure telephones and apps, bullying producers to disable options resembling FM radio, and outright mendacity about its personal community. His chief complaint is just not that Verizon is disabling options within the pursuit of revenue, it is that there’s “all the time this sample of deception with Verizon,” about why actions are being taken. Nguyen mentions Verizon has resorted to issuing statements about fraud prevention and never passing sure checks with out disclosing any data to backup such claims.
Within the last ruling that’s anticipated any time now, Verizon may very well be fined, pressured to take corrective actions, or may stroll away from the difficulty with out incident.